{"id":207,"date":"2021-10-13T20:45:59","date_gmt":"2021-10-13T20:45:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/etcwallet.net\/articles\/?p=207"},"modified":"2022-01-25T09:41:11","modified_gmt":"2022-01-25T09:41:11","slug":"how-ethereum-classic-appeared","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ethereumclassicwallet.com\/articles\/how-ethereum-classic-appeared","title":{"rendered":"ETC cryptocurrency: how the Ethereum Classic project appeared"},"content":{"rendered":"

The history of Ethereum Classic until the summer of 2016 is identical to the development path of the project, which today is known to the cryptocurrency community as Ethereum. The emergence of the “classic” version is due to the dramatic situation faced by the startup team one year after the cryptocurrency’s release.<\/span><\/p>\n

The incident is related to an initiative called DAO<\/a> (Decentralized Autonomous Organization).\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

The latter was an investment fund, the purpose of which was to finance promising projects. The organization was seen as a tool for centralized collection of funds from investors.<\/span><\/p>\n

The DAO organization<\/span><\/h2>\n

On June 17, 2016, a group of hackers discovered a vulnerability that helped them gain access to The DAO’s funds (about $50 million). Technically, the incident could have been solved by conducting a hardfork (the attackers could only access the investments after 28 days). However, at this point, members of the cryptocurrency community faced an ethical dilemma.<\/span><\/p>\n

The fact is that during the creation of Ethereum, the developers and users interested in the development of the project were guided by the principle “the code is the law”. What is law cannot be changed. A hard fork involves making adjustments. Accordingly, in terms of the original idea of the project, such changes are impossible.<\/span><\/p>\n

However, if the hard fork is rejected, Ethereum could lose DAO funds that have been accessed by attackers. Due to the circumstances, the participants of the crypto community were faced with the question of choosing the further development path of the project. The latter contained two options:<\/span><\/p>\n